SWG: Evolve Forums

Dont worry, been playing this game for many years and still no idea wtf im doing either welcome btw

Or side thought, maybe the vehicle garage can have barn functionality adding. Technically, beasts can be used as vehicles too

I’d like to suggest adding a larger barn-style structure for housing bigger beasts that currently don’t properly fit inside the standard barn.

A possible solution could be recoloring and repurposing an existing large structure to function as an “Expanded Barn” rather than creating a brand-new asset from scratch. This could keep development time lower while giving Creature Handlers a more practical option for displaying and storing larger pets.

Right now, some larger creatures feel cramped or clip inside the regular barn. A bigger structure would improve both functionality and immersion. Especially with the updates coming to CH

Thanks for considering!

well average then of 3 shuttle per planet. going to rank 3 would only add another 1 per

Well 2 accounts as you said its more getting more shuttles on the board, I personally dont see that as a bad thing. But no worries, thanks for getting back

except most players are in guild which in turn means most players live in these cities. Think proof is in the pudding. If you look at the maps theres not many cities showing with shuttles

With Evolve’s smaller playerbase, reaching Rank 4 is significantly harder than it was on live servers. As a result, there are very few cities with Shuttle Ports, which limits travel options and keeps activity centralized in just a handful of locations.

Lowering the requirement to Rank 3 would:

• Make shuttle access more attainable for active but smaller communities
• Encourage city development without requiring unrealistic population numbers
• Increase travel options across the galaxy
• Support overall server health by spreading activity

Rank 3 still requires coordination and commitment, so this wouldn’t trivialize city progression — it would simply better reflect the realities of our current population size.

This feels like a healthy quality-of-life adjustment for Evolve’s scale.

Got it. Strangely had to do it in incognito

Chavex, post: 4055, member: 155 wrote:

Uhm, I just used it and it worked.... both the link I posted in this thread, and the link under the play tab

[Unavailable historical attachment #1850]

Strange, its failing for me...
[URL unfurl="true"]https://gyazo.com/947a87f74e176713dff8da38199f61ca?token=8babfb418afa155e261ab3d27e4db07a[/URL]

Bump on this link broken again