Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

SWG: Evolve Forums

  1. Home
  2. Suggestions
  3. Reduce crafting cost

Reduce crafting cost

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suggestions
8 Posts 7 Posters 1.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Doom
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    some crafting takes alot of resources and takes some time alot of hand smapling depending on the planet. So my idea for a QOL is to reduce crafting cost by 25% to 50%.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ShirakawaS Offline
      ShirakawaS Offline
      Shirakawa
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Doom, post: 242, member: 14 wrote:

      some crafting takes alot of resources and takes some time alot of hand smapling depending on the planet. So my idea for a QOL is to reduce crafting cost by 25% to 50%.

      I think this suggestion comes from a good place but I'm not for it because it would further devalue minerals and the fact the time and effort put into crafting is a large part of what gives it value, if everyone can do everything instantly nothing has value, if people have to work towards things, pool resources and work together, that's how community is built.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • VikingmandoV Offline
        VikingmandoV Offline
        Vikingmando
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        As someone who pools resources with 3 other people. I do agree that CERTAIN things could use with a reduction in resource cost. Others not so much. There are some things that a change should be made rather than a reduction of resources.

        Elite Gas Harvesters for example use 9 wall modules and 21k units of metal instead of 18 wall modules to make compared to their elite counter-parts.

        If anything should be reduced in resource cost I'd say

        Elite Harvesters - Wall modules required to be on par with what they actually are. The equivelent of 4 capped mediums. (12 wall modules)
        BM Components and sub components on consumables - These take insane amounts of resources considering how many you use to make a single pet.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Sage
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I would be for this changed but not limited to just resources requirements. Component requirements for things like alcohol and BM consumables could hopefully be looked into

          Historical reactions: Like × 1

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • TodamasT Offline
            TodamasT Offline
            Todamas
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            25 - 50% decrease as a general statement to reduce all crafting costs is not a QoL change, but rather gigantic impact on crafting and would have long-term effects on the economy and value of resources.

            Things should take some time and we should not be able to get *everything *so quickly after a new server launch. Work together as a community and continually build better things is how SWG economy was built and why a lot of us still play today.

            I'd be interested to hear a more thought out approach to specific classes and schematics. Coming from someone doing more Architect lately, I can see an argument for certain things requiring less components (i.e. walls) but also understand the cost to make the walls is more so just related to time (which is OK, IMO).

            A general statement though on flat reducing crafting costs by 25-50% needs a lot more thought put into it and should not be implemented as it does not consider the downstream impacts.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • RezecR Offline
              RezecR Offline
              Rezec
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Not a fan of flat reductions, but the Wall issue is being addressed soon.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • DragazharD Offline
                DragazharD Offline
                Dragazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I am sorry to be late to this discussion but I wanted to put my 2 cents in. I have been an architect for while and I do not quite agree in a reduction of resource costs for anything on this server.. YES.. it takes 200k ore just to make 1 factory run of structure modules and another 20k for 100 Walls not to mention the steel but that's only 80k total. BUT.. on this server.. with the slots < lots > we have.. this is not a problem in my honest opinion. Besides, reducing resources used will lower the value of our products and thus lower our profits.

                Yes.. some Elites take less wall modules than others and the Moisture Vap takes structure modules lol and not even one wall. I am not sure what SOE was thinking here but with any game developer, people move around, get replaced.. get lazy.. have publisher problems... Things fall under the cracks. lol.

                Anyway, with the harvesting rate on this server, reducing the costs just would not make much sense to me. Harvesters will fill up in less than 2 days time and such make medium harvesters very viable for some people that do not need as many resources as say, SWs and archies. The amount of resources you get in a faster amount of time easily makes up for the cost.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Doom
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  What I was mean was a reduction of resources need to make consumable stuff like bm stuff as it takes so much resources.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                  Register Login
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups