<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Kashyyyk  Hand sample rate to be adjusted to mustafar rate or close]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">kashyyyk is pretty bad to sample and extract resources from while not as dangerous per say as mustafar still bad with all the pathing and instancing and also it is a expansion adventure planet I personally just feel this needs to be revisited to be brought more inline with mustafars extraction rates. just my two cents thank you.</p>
]]></description><link>https://swgevolve.com/forums/topic/935/kashyyyk-hand-sample-rate-to-be-adjusted-to-mustafar-rate-or-close</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 06:54:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://swgevolve.com/forums/topic/935.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:02:11 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kashyyyk  Hand sample rate to be adjusted to mustafar rate or close on Wed, 06 Aug 2025 23:46:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Bleep, post: 3334, member: 360 wrote:</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">kashyyyk is pretty bad to sample and extract resources from while not as dangerous per say as mustafar still bad with all the pathing and instancing and also it is a expansion adventure planet I personally just feel this needs to be revisited to be brought more inline with mustafars extraction rates. just my two cents thank you.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts! You're absolutely right that Kashyyyk presents some unique challenges when it comes to sampling and resource extraction, especially with its pathing and instance structure. We’ll take a closer look at how it compares to Mustafar in terms of extraction rates and overall viability. No guarantees, but it's definitely worth revisiting and we appreciate the detailed feedback.</p>
]]></description><link>https://swgevolve.com/forums/post/2896</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://swgevolve.com/forums/post/2896</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[orton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 23:46:10 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>