<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Jewelry QOL]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Either add a new Vendor or add the ability to an existing one. Trading one piece of jewelry for any one piece of another set. Is it possible? This would allow the corresponding jewelry set to be used when changing professions.</p>
]]></description><link>https://swgevolve.com/forums/topic/829/jewelry-qol</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 09:19:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://swgevolve.com/forums/topic/829.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 18:37:49 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jewelry QOL on Wed, 18 Jun 2025 19:44:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Gypsy42, post: 2953, member: 2098 wrote:</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">Either add a new Vendor or add the ability to an existing one. Trading one piece of jewelry for any one piece of another set. Is it possible? This would allow the corresponding jewelry set to be used when changing professions.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I mean technically its possible, but that would/could mean that only one set of jewelry is <em>ever</em> needed. While we could add something like a monetary value to use the vendor, it would drastically devalue the tokens in general</p>
<p dir="auto"><em>Historical reactions: Like × 2</em></p>
]]></description><link>https://swgevolve.com/forums/post/2601</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://swgevolve.com/forums/post/2601</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chavex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 19:44:19 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>